🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.